Advanced

SiPM Photon Detection Efficiency (PDE) Calculator

Compute the overall Photon Detection Efficiency (PDE) of a SiPM by entering its Quantum Efficiency (QE), Fill Factor (FF), and Geiger Trigger Probability (P_G). The fraction bar shows exactly how each factor reduces the detected count from 100 incident photons.

%

Fraction of incident photons that generate an electron–hole pair in the silicon

%

Ratio of active microcell area to total pixel area (border/quench-resistor dead area reduces this)

%

Probability that a photogenerated carrier initiates a self-sustaining Geiger avalanche
Photon Detection Efficiency (PDE)
22.40%

Fraction of incident photons that produce a detected Geiger discharge: PDE = QE × FF × P_G

Quantum Efficiency (QE)
40 %
Fill Factor (FF)
70 %
Geiger Trigger Prob. (P_G)
80 %
PDE = QE × FF × P_G
22.4 %
60%
12%
6%
22%
Not absorbed (QE loss)
Inactive area (FF loss)
No avalanche (P_G loss)
Detected (PDE)
Fate of 100 incident photons: each factor multiplies into the final PDE
Step by step
  1. 1

    QE × FF (photons in active area, %)

    40 × 70 ÷ 100 = 28
    Fraction of photons absorbed and landing in an active microcell.
  2. 2

    PDE = (QE × FF) × P_G ÷ 100 (%)

    28 × 80 ÷ 100 = 22.40
    Multiply by the Geiger trigger probability to get the final detection efficiency.
Results are estimates for general information only and are not professional advice — always verify important results independently before relying on them. Read the full disclaimer.
Quick answer

How does this calculator work?

Photon Detection Efficiency of a SiPM equals Quantum Efficiency × Fill Factor × Geiger Trigger Probability (all as fractions). Enter QE (absorption), FF (active-area fraction), and P_G (avalanche probability) to get the percentage of incident photons that actually produce a detected output pulse.

Formula
PDE = QE × FF × P_G (all as fractions 0–1; result × 100 gives %)
How this is calculated

A Silicon Photomultiplier (SiPM) consists of thousands of microscopic Geiger-mode avalanche photodiode (GAPD) microcells wired in parallel. Three successive processes determine whether an incident photon produces an output pulse.

First, the photon must be absorbed by the silicon lattice and generate an electron–hole pair. The probability of this is the Quantum Efficiency (QE), which depends on the anti-reflection coating, the wavelength of the light, and the doping profile of the silicon. Modern SiPMs achieve QE of 20–50% at their peak wavelength (typically 420–550 nm). Second, the generated carrier must be in an electrically active region; if it lands in the dead-area border (quench resistor, metal interconnect, trench) it is lost. The Fill Factor (FF) is the ratio of active area to total pixel area, ranging from about 30% in fine-pitch devices to over 80% in coarse-pitch ones. Third, the carrier must trigger a self-sustaining Geiger avalanche with probability P_G, which rises with the overvoltage (Vbias − Vbreakdown) and can exceed 90% at high overvoltage. PDE is the product of all three: PDE = QE × FF × P_G.

The FractionBar shows the four fates of 100 incident photons: those lost because they are not absorbed (QE loss), those absorbed but landing in inactive area (FF loss), those that reach an active cell but fail to trigger an avalanche (P_G loss), and those that produce a count (PDE). Increasing any one factor proportionally increases PDE, but practical devices trade off FF against dynamic range (smaller cells → lower FF but more cells → higher saturation level), and higher overvoltage improves P_G at the cost of more dark counts.

Frequently asked questions

State-of-the-art devices from Hamamatsu (MPPC), onsemi (SensL), and Broadcom achieve peak PDEs of 25–60% at their optimum wavelength. The best values are obtained at higher overvoltage with large cell pitches and specialised coatings.

Higher overvoltage (Vbias − Vbreakdown) increases the Geiger trigger probability P_G, directly raising PDE. However, it also raises the dark count rate (thermally generated spurious pulses) and optical crosstalk between cells, so an operating point is chosen to balance PDE against noise for the application.

Each cell has a fixed-width border of quench resistor, metal lines, and isolation trench. As pitch decreases the border stays roughly the same absolute width, so it takes up a larger fraction of the total cell area. A 100 µm pitch cell might have FF > 70%, while a 10 µm pitch cell can fall below 30%.

Also known as

sipm pde calculator
photon detection efficiency calculator
silicon photomultiplier efficiency
geiger trigger probability
fill factor sipm calculation
quantum efficiency detector
sipm performance calculator

APA

TG we-Calculate Editorial Team. (2026). SiPM Photon Detection Efficiency (PDE) Calculator [Online calculator]. TG we-Calculate. https://we-calculate.com/calculator/pde-sipm-calculator

Chicago

TG we-Calculate Editorial Team. "SiPM Photon Detection Efficiency (PDE) Calculator." TG we-Calculate. 2026. https://we-calculate.com/calculator/pde-sipm-calculator.

IEEE

TG we-Calculate Editorial Team, "SiPM Photon Detection Efficiency (PDE) Calculator," TG we-Calculate, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://we-calculate.com/calculator/pde-sipm-calculator

BibTeX

@misc{wecalculate_pde_sipm_calculator, title = {SiPM Photon Detection Efficiency (PDE) Calculator}, author = {{TG we-Calculate Editorial Team}}, howpublished = {\url{https://we-calculate.com/calculator/pde-sipm-calculator}}, year = {2026}, note = {TG we-Calculate} }

Did this calculator help you?