Intermediate

PEG Ratio Calculator — Price/Earnings-to-Growth

The PEG ratio adjusts the P/E multiple for earnings growth — Peter Lynch's benchmark for whether a stock's price is fair relative to its growth rate. Enter a P/E ratio and expected annual EPS growth rate to get an instant growth-adjusted valuation signal.
Price-to-earnings ratio (price ÷ EPS). Overrides price/EPS fields.

%

Annual EPS growth rate in percent (e.g. 15 for 15%). Use trailing 5-yr avg or analyst forward estimate.
Used to compute P/E when combined with EPS below
Trailing twelve-month EPS for computing P/E

%

Forward analyst estimate — used to show a second PEG for comparison
PEG Ratio
1.67

P/E ÷ Growth Rate (%) • Fair value benchmark: 1.0 (Peter Lynch)

Moderately overvalued by PEG metric
P/E ratio used
25×
EPS growth rate (input)
15 %
PEG ratio
1.67
Forward PEG (alt. growth)
PEG valuation spectrum — lower signals better relative value: Overvalued (1.5–2.0)
Step by step
  1. 1

    P/E ratio

    25
  2. 2

    EPS growth rate

    15 %
  3. 3

    PEG ratio

    25 ÷ 15 = 1.67
    P/E divided by the annual EPS growth rate in percent — fair value benchmark is 1.0.
Lock the current result, then change any input to compare scenarios.
Results are estimates for general information only and are not professional advice — always verify important results independently before relying on them. This is not financial, investment or tax advice; consult a qualified professional. Read the full disclaimer.
Quick answer

How does this calculator work?

PEG = P/E ÷ EPS Growth Rate (%). Peter Lynch's fair value benchmark is 1.0 — below 1 may indicate undervaluation, above 1 suggests growth is priced in. Enter the P/E ratio (or stock price + EPS) and expected annual earnings growth to get an instant growth-adjusted valuation signal. Best applied to profitable companies with consistent positive earnings.

Formula
PEG = P/E Ratio ÷ Annual EPS Growth Rate (%) • P/E = Stock Price ÷ EPS • Fair value benchmark: PEG = 1.0
How this is calculated

The PEG (Price/Earnings-to-Growth) ratio was popularised by Peter Lynch in his 1989 book "One Up on Wall Street" as a way to correct the P/E ratio's blindness to growth. A pure P/E of 40× looks expensive until you discover the company is growing earnings at 40% per year — a PEG of 1.0 in that case, which Lynch called fair value. Dividing the P/E by the annual EPS growth rate produces a single number that can be compared across companies with different growth rates: below 1 suggests undervaluation, above 1 suggests the market is pricing in more growth than the company may deliver.

The choice of growth rate matters enormously. Trailing five-year EPS growth is factual and avoids analyst optimism but ignores acceleration or deceleration. The consensus forward growth rate (from analyst estimates) reflects current expectations but can be wildly wrong in cyclical industries or during earnings inflections. Using both and comparing the resulting PEGs gives a range rather than a single figure. Some analysts also compute the forward PEG by replacing trailing EPS with next-year's consensus estimate in the P/E before dividing by the long-run growth rate.

PEG has important limitations. It becomes meaningless or misleading for companies with negative EPS (loss-makers), near-zero growth (where any P/E divided by a small number inflates PEG), extreme cyclicality (where EPS reverts to the mean), or very high capital intensity (where growth requires lots of reinvestment that EPS does not capture). Treat a low PEG as a hypothesis to investigate — not a buy signal — alongside balance-sheet quality, cash flow, and competitive dynamics.

Frequently asked questions

Peter Lynch's rule of thumb is that a PEG of 1.0 represents fair value: you pay one multiple point for each percentage point of expected earnings growth. Below 1 is considered potentially undervalued; above 1 suggests growth is already priced in. In practice, acceptable PEG levels vary by sector — technology investors may accept 1.5–2 for high-conviction secular growth stories, while value investors target below 0.75.

Both have trade-offs. Historical 5-year EPS growth is factual and avoids analyst optimism bias, but past growth may not persist. Forward consensus estimates reflect current business expectations and can price in structural changes, but analysts tend to be systematically over-optimistic. A conservative approach is to use the lower of the two; computing PEG with both gives you a range rather than a false single estimate.

Yes, if either EPS or the growth rate is negative, producing a meaningless negative PEG that cannot be interpreted as cheap or expensive. The metric also breaks down for companies with near-zero EPS or near-zero growth, where tiny denominators produce extreme ratios. Restrict PEG analysis to companies with consistently positive and growing earnings in the 5–50% annual range for the most reliable signals.

Also known as

peg ratio calculator
price earnings to growth ratio
peter lynch peg ratio
growth adjusted pe ratio
peg ratio formula stock
undervalued stock peg
pe to growth ratio calculator

APA

TG we-Calculate Editorial Team. (2026). PEG Ratio Calculator — Price/Earnings-to-Growth [Online calculator]. TG we-Calculate. https://we-calculate.com/calculator/peg-ratio-calculator

Chicago

TG we-Calculate Editorial Team. "PEG Ratio Calculator — Price/Earnings-to-Growth." TG we-Calculate. 2026. https://we-calculate.com/calculator/peg-ratio-calculator.

IEEE

TG we-Calculate Editorial Team, "PEG Ratio Calculator — Price/Earnings-to-Growth," TG we-Calculate, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://we-calculate.com/calculator/peg-ratio-calculator

BibTeX

@misc{wecalculate_peg_ratio_calculator, title = {PEG Ratio Calculator — Price/Earnings-to-Growth}, author = {{TG we-Calculate Editorial Team}}, howpublished = {\url{https://we-calculate.com/calculator/peg-ratio-calculator}}, year = {2026}, note = {TG we-Calculate} }

Did this calculator help you?